Pedagogical Strategies and Teachers’ Reading Intervention Practices in Enhancing School Reading Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i3.488Keywords:
reading intervention, literacy instruction, pedagogical strategies, school reading programs, learner engagement, qualitative study, PhilippinesAbstract
This qualitative study explored pedagogical strategies and teachers’ reading intervention practices in enhancing school reading programs in the Cabatuan West District, Schools Division of Isabela. The study aimed to examine the instructional approaches, literacy intervention strategies, and classroom practices utilized by teachers in supporting struggling readers and strengthening school-based reading programs. Using a descriptive qualitative research design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, focus group discussions, and document analysis involving reading coordinators, elementary teachers, and selected learners. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (1) learner-centered and differentiated reading instructional strategies, (2) collaborative literacy support and motivational intervention practices, (3) contextualized and adaptive reading program implementation, and (4) instructional and operational challenges in sustaining school reading programs. Findings showed that teachers implemented guided reading, phonics instruction, peer-assisted learning, remedial reading sessions, contextualized literacy activities, and differentiated instruction to improve learners’ reading fluency, comprehension, and confidence. Learners became more engaged and motivated when literacy instruction was interactive, supportive, and aligned with their reading levels and interests. However, inadequate reading resources, limited instructional time, learner diversity, and insufficient parental support affected program implementation. The study concludes that learner-centered pedagogical strategies and adaptive reading intervention practices significantly contribute to literacy improvement and learner engagement in school reading programs. Strengthening literacy resources, teacher professional development, and community literacy partnerships is recommended to enhance reading intervention programs in public elementary schools.
References
Allington, R. L. (2012). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dela Peña, J. T. (2020). Challenges and adaptive practices among rural elementary teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 9(6), 112–124.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
OECD. (2019). Education in rural communities: Challenges and policy responses. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ca410d30-en
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Lev Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studies in Technology and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Studies in Technology and Education (STE) are freely accessible under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license grants users the right to read, download, copy, distribute, and link to the full texts for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given and that the original work remains unaltered and unchanged.
This article is made available in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.