Editorial Policies

International Review of Pedagogical Innovation and Learning Sciences (IRPILS)

  1. Peer Review Policy

IRPILS is a refereed, double-blind peer-reviewed journal. All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening followed by evaluation by at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. The identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure fairness, objectivity, and academic integrity. Editorial decisions are based on originality, methodological rigor, scholarly contribution, and relevance to the journal’s scope.

  1. Publication Ethics (COPE Compliance)

IRPILS adheres to the ethical standards prescribed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct.

  • Authors must ensure originality, proper citation, and accurate reporting of data.
  • Editors must ensure unbiased decision-making and confidentiality.
  • Reviewers must provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback.

Cases of ethical misconduct (e.g., fabrication, falsification, plagiarism) will be handled in accordance with COPE guidelines.

  1. Plagiarism Policy

All submissions are screened using reputable plagiarism detection software (e.g., Turnitin or equivalent). Manuscripts must meet a maximum similarity index of 10–15% (excluding references).

  • Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and improper citation are strictly prohibited.
  • Manuscripts found with significant overlap will be rejected or returned for revision.
  • Confirmed cases of misconduct may result in blacklisting of authors and notification of affiliated institutions.
  1. Authorship and Contribution

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All listed authors must approve the final manuscript and agree to its submission.

  1. Conflict of Interest

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that may influence the research or its interpretation.

  1. Data Integrity and Transparency

Authors are expected to maintain accurate data records and, when requested, provide access to raw data for verification. Fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of data is strictly prohibited.

  1. Open Access Policy

IRPILS promotes the dissemination of knowledge and may adopt an open-access model, allowing readers to freely access published content while ensuring proper citation and attribution.

  1. Retraction and Correction Policy

IRPILS follows COPE guidelines in issuing corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern when necessary. Articles may be retracted in cases of significant ethical violations or unreliable findings.